Politics · Society

Societal Cracks due to Multiculturalism

I recently travelled to a moderately large German city for a business trip. It’s one of those places with an old university and the corresponding metastasizing companies and NGOs. Basically, directly or indirectly everybody lives off the taxpayers’ dime, which leads to a rather left-leaning political landscape. After checking into my hotel, which was located close to the major tourist sites, I walked around for a bit and, boy, was I in for a ride.

Imagine you walk through the pedestrian area of a city with some surviving medieval buildings and some neoclassical ones that the Allies didn’t bomb to dust during their many assaults on civilians, i.e. war crimes, at the end of World War II. So, you get some resemblance of the past glory of Germany, interspersed with the ugliness of post-war architecture. There are graffiti on many corners and there’s trash on the pavements, despite the easy availability of trash cans. That was sobering enough, but then the main act started: I overheard some people argue. From the looks of it, an underclass white German got into an argument with two Syrian doctor-engineers. The German was tall and pretty well-built, the third-worlders, on the other hand, were pretty scrawny, but they acted as if they owned the place. I could not discern what the problem was and didn’t care. Yet, the doctor-engineers walked off and the German walked after them, with his belt in his hands, telling them to stop so they could get the beating they deserved.

This played out in broad daylight and basically right next to me. Sadly, I was in a residential area, so there were no stores I could find refuge in. Instead, I did the sane thing, kept my distance, did not make eye contact, and kept walking. That’s probably the best you can do in those situations. I recall one incident I was in when I visited NYC. One of those lovely African-Americans squeezed my nose on the subway, hurled an insult at me, disguised as a joke (“Maan, das a biiig-nose-ni**a!”), and baited me to attack him. All of this was completely unprovoked. I saw that he had friends with him and I bet they were just looking for a white guy to beat up. I calmly got up got off the train. Luckily, I got out of this completely unharmed. As far as my run-ins with the underclass go, that one was the easily the worst encounter of my life. Even though I have been relatively spared from attacks by minorities, I am well-aware that there is plenty of racial conflict to be found. It’s just not from the supposed oppressor class, the whites, to all those poor minorities. It’s the other way round, instead.

In the United States, race tensions are quite intense. Black-on-white violence is a relatively frequent occurrence. It’s certainly a lot more frequent, both in absolute and relative numbers, than white-on-black violence. The number of white men who rape black women, or white men who rob or beat up black men is essentially zero. This is the US. In contrast, Europe used to be pretty safe, at least from my rather sheltered perspective. That is not to say that there weren’t any issues. From friends and acquaintances I heard some rather harrowing stories. Even ten to fifteen years ago there were stories of gangs of Arab kids who beat up German kids after school, but you still had plenty of schools where there was a clear white majority. Today, this is hardly ever the case anymore. It’s increasingly difficult to escape racial conflicts.

Segregation helps to avoid conflict. I’d say, if walk into a black neighbourhood in the U.S. and get robbed, then part of the blame should probably be on you. You could just stay in safe neighbourhoods; nobody forced you to explore the underworld. Yet, racial tensions have been a commonplace phenomenon in, say, France and the United Kingdom for decades. Even in the 1950s there were countless reports of criminal from ethnic minorities; probably more than nowadays because back then the press was more concerned with reporting facts as opposed to today’s purveyors of fake news. It’s an old problem, but it’s more difficult to avoid it nowadays as our collective safe spaces have been shrinking.

I have lived in London for about two years and didn’t have any issues with members of ethnic minorities. Yet, I knew people who had to live in the outskirts or in cheaper areas who experienced a lot of abuse. One girl I knew got repeatedly insulted by her friendly neighbourhood Muslims on the way to the underground (that’s the UK term for ‘subway’). She recounted that she would get called a “whore” and “slut” by strangers. The situation got so bad that she eventually moved back to her Scandinavian home country. Not only women suffer. A male friend of mine got an apartment in an area in London in which there were many Pakistanis. He told me he repeatedly got spat on in the street just because he was white. After a few weeks he had enough and left. This was quite costly for him, both in terms of money lost and in opportunity costs, because he dropped out of an expensive Master’s program at the London School of Economics; he just didn’t want to deal with such nonsense. On a side note, a year later he embarked on an MPhil program at Cambridge, so apart from the time and money lost, things turned out well for him in terms of his education. Now he’s making money hand over fist in his job. As he is earning more money than he can reasonably spend, and also much more than he needs to retire in comfort, he is financially supporting identitarian groups with his spare cash. Funny how life experiences shape political views.

I was recalling incidents as the ones above as I further explored the city. On my way back to the hotel, though, I ran into another potentially tricky situation. There were three police men who had separated a bunch of guys. On one side, you had a few low class whites, possibly homeless young men. On the other, there were four or five dark-skinned doctors and engineers, all dressed in branded clothes, presumably bought with proceeds made from dealing drugs and welfare benefits. One of the Germans loudly complained to the police that the immigrants constantly provoke them and recalled verbal as well as physical attacks. I did not stick around to see how this encounter played out. Yet, Germany has been establishing a two-tiered legal system according to which the brown-skinned are a protected class. As a supposed refugee, you can almost act with impunity [German]. Yet, if you’re a white German and post anything critical on the mass immigration of unskilled third-worlders on Facebook, the police may raid your apartment [German]. You may even serve time in jail for it [German]. Thus, I don’t expect those doctors and engineers to suffer any consequences, particularly not in a heavily left-leaning university town.

I don’t quite recall where I read it, but I do remember learning from a book on life in the animal kingdom that there is no known instance where different subspecies co-exist in the long run. If there are two subspecies of the same kind of animal in one area, one of them either migrates or gets killed. There are no “melting pots” in nature, just like there are none in human society. Humans are, ultimately, just animals. There are no examples of successful multicultural societies; instead, ethnic subgroups isolate themselves and gather were members of their tribe have settled. Thus, you have Italian and Polish parts in New York City, the supposed melting pot of cultures.

The most successful multicultural societies have a ruling class that, in some way or another, suppresses other ethnicities. There are too many examples to list. I think a good one is Malaysia, where there is preferential treatment for Malays and massive discrimination against the Chinese. The case of Malaysia is interesting because its neighbour, Singapore, is often touted as a picture-book case of multiculturalism. Yet, Singapore is highly authoritarian. The press his controlled, and the reason for this is that Lee Kuan Yew didn’t want the press to promote racial conflict, something he has observed to happen in the vaunted Western democracies. There is no free speech in Singapore either. If you post anything the government deems to be “fake news” or an “incitement to racial hatred”, you’re in trouble. Still, there have been riots in Singapore. The most recent one is the Little India riot, which happened just a few years ago. So, even in a country that is ruled with an iron fist there is so much racial tension that it may just erupt in a bout of mindless violence.

The multiracial utopia will never happen. People want to live next to people who are like them. Blacks rather live next to blacks than to whites. Of course, even the most ardent promoters of multiculturalism, liberal whites (and jews), prefer their own kind over anybody else. This plays out beautifully in the most hypocritical country in the West as well, Sweden, which has highly segregated cities. They bring in boatloads of third-worlders and segregate them just so that they can feel morally superior over other countries. In the end, everybody will suffer. There is no proper endgame. Instead, you can only solve it peacefully via forced repatriation or a two-state solution, and in the case of the latter, who would guarantee that you would not have another class of self-righteous hypocritical cucks who want to flood your country with the third world once again? Recall that the first Naturalization Law of the United States limited citizenship to “free white men of good character”. Today, that seems to be the one group the U.S. wants to keep out.


Did you enjoy this article? Excellent! If you want to read more by Aaron, check out his excellent books, the latest of which is Meditation Without Bullshit.
Aaron is available for one-on-one consultation sessions if you want honest advice.
Lastly, donations for the upkeep of this site are highly welcome.

4 thoughts on “Societal Cracks due to Multiculturalism

  1. To be honest now I prefer this blog to your another blog regarding pick up and woman’s true nature, this is ,aaronsleazy.com”. I feel like everything has been said about women and pick up, and there is not much to be add there. I personally would like to see you more writing here than there

  2. I found these two comments on zerohedge and I think they put together some stats and conclusions, that you’ve been speaking about frequently. This is in relation to multiculti, predominantly looking at the black population.

    The comment links are:
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-09-09/these-are-worlds-safest-cities?commentId=fd02e21f-9c50-442e-819f-3941b76b78a1
    and
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-09-09/these-are-worlds-safest-cities?commentId=c5628827-5beb-47af-a98b-8c4dac94d1c3

    Here in plain text:

    The Color of Crime:

    • Black males age 18-35 years of age are only 1.8% of the U.S. population, yet have committed 52% of homicides from 1980-2008. Black males (all ages) are only 6% of the U.S. population, yet commit 46% of all violent crimes, and 50% of the gun homicides. If Blacks were removed from the equation, the U.S. gun homicide rate would be equal to Great Britain’s, who have some of the most restrictive gun control laws in the world.

    • White men and women who choose to date or marry Blacks are much more likely to suffer abuse from their partners, particularly spousal homicide. The highest risk of death by spousal homicide is incurred by White women married to Black men. A White woman married to a Black man is over 12 times as likely to be murdered by her husband as a White woman married to a White man. A White man married to a Black woman is 21 times as likely to be murdered by his wife as a White man married to a White woman.

    • The Black homicide rate is 17 per 100,000, a rate over 9x that of the White rate, and comparable to some of those most murderous countries in the world. If the homicide rate for the U.S. were the White-only rate, the homicide rate would drop 84%, making the U.S. rate comparable to European countries.

    • Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving Blacks and Whites, Blacks commit 85 percent and Whites commit 15 percent. This means that a Black is 27 times more likely to attack a White person than vice versa.

    • For each one standard deviation increase in proportion of Black population, firearm homicide rate is increased by 82.8%. Therefore, the U.S. has a Black problem, not a gun or violent crime problem. When Blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-Blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.

    • Murder is the leading cause of death for Black men, ages 15 to 34. Their murderers are other Black men 93 percent of the time.

    • Black males between 16-35 years of age are only 4.2% of the population, yet commit 72% of the street crime in America.

    • The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is Black.

    • If New York City were all White, the murder rate would drop by 91 percent, the robbery rate by 81 percent, and the shootings rate by 97 percent. In an all-White Chicago, murder would decline 90 percent, rape by 81 percent, and robbery by 90 percent.

    • The United States is third in murders throughout the world, but if you omit just five Black cities (Chicago, Detroit, Washington DC, St Louis, and New Orleans) from the equation, then the United States is fourth from the bottom.

    • Black serial killers have comprised over half of documented serial killers since the dawn of the 21st century at 56 percent, making up a total of 40 percent in years dating back to 1900. Blacks constituted 44% of the known serial killers during the 1995-2004 period and 38.2% of all multiple murderers (serial, mass, and spree combined) during 1976-1998 period. During the 2000-2010 decade, 62% of serial killers were Black.

    https://www.scribd.com/doc/305240780/The-Color-of-Crime

    https://archive.org/details/6396bf06c11b81777c27ca0edcb4fdbb4ae17354576954101f6d
    6ce3a015b806

    https://archive.org/details/SerialKillerRate

    2019 Data Shows 51% of Mass Shooters Were Black, Only 29% Were White:

    https://summit.news/2019/08/07/2019-data-shows-51-of-mass-shooters-were-black-only-29-were-white/

    In 2016, the police fatally shot 233 Blacks, the vast majority armed and dangerous, according to the Washington Post. The paper categorized only 16 Black male victims of police shootings as “unarmed.” That classification masks assaults against officers and violent resistance to arrest.

    Contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, the police have much more to fear from Black males than Black males have to fear from the police. In 2015, a police officer was 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a Black male than an unarmed Black male was to be killed by a police officer.

    From 1980 to 2013, there were 2,269 officers killed in felonious incidents, and 2,896 offenders. The racial breakdown of offenders over that 33-year period was 52% White, and 41% Black. So, the 13% total Black population in the U.S. commits 41% of police murders.

    Further, Black males have made up 42% of all cop-killers over the last decade, though they are only 6 percent of the population. That 18.5 ratio undoubtedly worsened in 2016, in light of the 53 percent increase in gun murders of officers — committed vastly and disproportionately by Black males.

    IQ correlates strongly to job performance, wealth, income, economic growth, livability, cooperation, life expectancy, and infant mortality.

    Blacks are the only race never to have civilized. No modern creations exist in sub-Saharan Africa that were not brought there by Whites. Without continuous intervention, Blacks cannot even maintain what Whites gave them.

    19 of the 20 poorest countries are sub-Saharan African. There are no White Third-World nations, but all Black ones are.

    The average national IQ of the world is only 90. Fewer than one in five nations have National IQs of 100. Almost half have National IQs of 90 or less.

    It is estimated in a study published in IQ and the Wealth of Nations that a National IQ of 90 is the threshold for a technological economy:

    African Black (IQ 67) + White (IQ 102) = American Black, 24% White admixture (IQ 85).

    The more White a society is the more safe and prosperous it is.

    National IQ correlates at 0.73 with living standard.

    Each 10 point increase in IQ generally doubles economic growth, assuming the country has a market economy.

    The following intelligence scores came from work carried out earlier this decade by Richard Lynn, a British psychologist, and Tatu Vanhanen, a Finnish political scientist, who analysed IQ studies from 113 countries, and from subsequent work by Jelte Wicherts, a Dutch psychologist. The study was published in IQ and the Wealth of Nations and has nearly a a thousand cites. Lynn and Vanhanen benchmarked their IQ results so that Britain is 100. America scores 98 on this scale, and the world average is 90.

    Google: National IQs

    Notice a pattern?

    • 108 Singapore
    • 106 South Korea
    • 105 Japan
    • 105 China
    • 102 Italy
    • 101 Iceland
    • 101 Mongolia
    • 101 Switzerland
    • 100 Austria
    • 100 Luxembourg
    • 100 Netherlands
    • 100 Norway
    • 100 United Kingdom
    • 99 Belgium
    • 99 Canada
    • 99 Estonia
    • 99 Finland
    • 99 Germany
    • 99 New Zealand

    [snip]

    • 70 Botswana
    • 70 Rwanda
    • 69 Burundi
    • 69 Cote d’Ivoire
    • 69 Ethiopia
    • 69 Malawi
    • 69 Niger
    • 68 Angola
    • 68 Chad
    • 68 Djibouti
    • 68 Somalia
    • 68 Swaziland
    • 67 Dominica
    • 67 Guinea
    • 67 Haiti
    • 67 Liberia
    • 66 Gambia
    • 65 Congo
    • 64 Cameroon
    • 64 Gabon
    • 64 Sierra Leone
    • 64 Mozambique
    • 59 Equatorial Guinea

    Blacks can only achieve because they have White admixture or because they reside in White societies. Too few of them are smart enough to even build sufficient infrastructure in Africa to allow the Black intellectual elite to achieve.

    Sub-Saharan Africans have never made a contribution to the world. Blacks can only achieve either because they are mixed with White genes or because they reside in White societies. Blacks are unable to achieve within their own race because not enough of them are smart enough to build a sufficient infrastructure to allow the Black intellectual elite to achieve. If allowed to become too numerous they destroy previously-thriving and safe White cities.

    This is why Blacks seethe with jealousy and hatred of Whites yet can’t seem to stay away because they want what we create and maintain, no matter if they deserve it or not. They want our peaceful and clean neighborhoods, our law and order, our technology and science, our school systems, our inventions, the jobs we create, the food we grow, the transportation we invent, the entertainment we provide….. Blacks hate us but can’t live without us. That’s why they demand that we take care of them and give them special rights and privileges that we don’t grant ourselves, just to compensate for their inability at living in a modern and technologically-advanced civilization.

    Some groups succeed all the time, everywhere. Some have never succeeded anywhere.

    Blacks are the oldest race, so they should be the most advanced race; but they never developed at all and had to be domesticated by Whites.

    National IQs calculated and validated for 108 nations

    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/48d7/843f6ce714a684a93530a0c8b7da65d185db.pdf

    https://mason.gmu.edu/~gjonesb/IQandNationalProductivity.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.